<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ScreenFlow 2.0 Released Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.equixotic.com/2009/10/26/screenflow-2-0-released-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.equixotic.com/2009/10/26/screenflow-2-0-released-today/</link>
	<description>A starry-eyed quest for beautiful eLearning and presentations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:26:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.equixotic.com/2009/10/26/screenflow-2-0-released-today/comment-page-1/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equixotic.com/?p=525#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>Did you ever write a review of this update? I used the site/blog search feature and it didn&#039;t turn up, but maybe I overlooked something. I&#039;m in the market to buy a screencast tool (having last used Screencast [now Screenflick] around 2 years ago) and looking for reviews...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever write a review of this update? I used the site/blog search feature and it didn&#8217;t turn up, but maybe I overlooked something. I&#8217;m in the market to buy a screencast tool (having last used Screencast [now Screenflick] around 2 years ago) and looking for reviews&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Angileri</title>
		<link>http://www.equixotic.com/2009/10/26/screenflow-2-0-released-today/comment-page-1/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Angileri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equixotic.com/?p=525#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>Agreed. My current PC is a self-built machine that&#039;s now 4 years old and has all the best parts from that time. But it is noisy, it now has quirks, and while it operates mostly just fine, it&#039;s slow and has a hard time with parts of CS4. The 27&quot; iMac by contrast has copious desktop space, and probably all the power I&#039;ll need. And yes, there is no way I&#039;d be able to get a complete i7 quad core machine for $2k if I did it myself, *and* I wouldn&#039;t have a huge new monitor.

But regarding money spent shopping for parts? It&#039;s only wasted if you don&#039;t like window shopping. If that were money wasted I&#039;ve already paid for part of my new iMac. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. My current PC is a self-built machine that&#8217;s now 4 years old and has all the best parts from that time. But it is noisy, it now has quirks, and while it operates mostly just fine, it&#8217;s slow and has a hard time with parts of CS4. The 27&#8243; iMac by contrast has copious desktop space, and probably all the power I&#8217;ll need. And yes, there is no way I&#8217;d be able to get a complete i7 quad core machine for $2k if I did it myself, *and* I wouldn&#8217;t have a huge new monitor.</p>
<p>But regarding money spent shopping for parts? It&#8217;s only wasted if you don&#8217;t like window shopping. If that were money wasted I&#8217;ve already paid for part of my new iMac. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.equixotic.com/2009/10/26/screenflow-2-0-released-today/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equixotic.com/?p=525#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve built my own computers in the past and found that the money I saved was quickly eaten up with the time I spent researching, buying, assembling, and troubleshooting the pile of parts.  And the end product tended to be ugly, noisy, and left a pile of cables on my desk.  Those days are behind me now.

The iMac is my perfect computer, and at the 27&quot; size, you&#039;d have a hard time building your own system for less as 27&quot; IPS panels are very expensive.  And the ability to run every OS (and every application) on a single machine is a huge advantage in eLearning development (or anything else).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve built my own computers in the past and found that the money I saved was quickly eaten up with the time I spent researching, buying, assembling, and troubleshooting the pile of parts.  And the end product tended to be ugly, noisy, and left a pile of cables on my desk.  Those days are behind me now.</p>
<p>The iMac is my perfect computer, and at the 27&#8243; size, you&#8217;d have a hard time building your own system for less as 27&#8243; IPS panels are very expensive.  And the ability to run every OS (and every application) on a single machine is a huge advantage in eLearning development (or anything else).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Angileri</title>
		<link>http://www.equixotic.com/2009/10/26/screenflow-2-0-released-today/comment-page-1/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Angileri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equixotic.com/?p=525#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the advice. Switching is definitely easier than it ever has been, and although I don&#039;t mind building my own PC from pieces, I don&#039;t know that I have the time (school, work, spouse), and I don&#039;t think I&#039;d save any money. I went in to take a look at the new 27&quot; over the weekend, and I&#039;m hard pressed to think of a better solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the advice. Switching is definitely easier than it ever has been, and although I don&#8217;t mind building my own PC from pieces, I don&#8217;t know that I have the time (school, work, spouse), and I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d save any money. I went in to take a look at the new 27&#8243; over the weekend, and I&#8217;m hard pressed to think of a better solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.equixotic.com/2009/10/26/screenflow-2-0-released-today/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equixotic.com/?p=525#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>Hey Paul,

Actually, I&#039;ve always been a Mac First, Windows Second guy.  It used to be that I had two machines on my desk running side by side to give me access to both platforms, but Apple&#039;s switch to Intel processors eliminated the need for that kludge.  Now I run both OSes simultaneously on a 24&quot; iMac using VMware Fusion.

Fusion works great, and should work even better with version 3 released this week.  It really is a seamless experience.  I run Articulate software (along with PowerPoint 2007) on the Windows side and pretty much everything else on the Mac side.

The new 27&quot; iMac looks like a fantastic machine, particularly the quad core.  I will probably be upgrading to that machine in the very near future.

I don&#039;t think you can go wrong with this setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Paul,</p>
<p>Actually, I&#8217;ve always been a Mac First, Windows Second guy.  It used to be that I had two machines on my desk running side by side to give me access to both platforms, but Apple&#8217;s switch to Intel processors eliminated the need for that kludge.  Now I run both OSes simultaneously on a 24&#8243; iMac using VMware Fusion.</p>
<p>Fusion works great, and should work even better with version 3 released this week.  It really is a seamless experience.  I run Articulate software (along with PowerPoint 2007) on the Windows side and pretty much everything else on the Mac side.</p>
<p>The new 27&#8243; iMac looks like a fantastic machine, particularly the quad core.  I will probably be upgrading to that machine in the very near future.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you can go wrong with this setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Angileri</title>
		<link>http://www.equixotic.com/2009/10/26/screenflow-2-0-released-today/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Angileri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equixotic.com/?p=525#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Hello Chris. Thanks for posting this. I was wondering: Since you recently switched to Mac as your platform for development, have you used BootCamp or VMWare Fusion to run Window-tied apps? What has been your experience if you have? The problem I&#039;m dealing with right now is the very latest iMac is making a very good case for itself as my next purchase...but seeing as how I got CS4 MC last year, it would be a bit of a shame to have a great machine that I can only run my big apps through virtualization on. Is the experience fairly seemless? It&#039;s been a while since I&#039;ve used VMWare, so I assume it&#039;s quite a bit smoother and better than it was then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Chris. Thanks for posting this. I was wondering: Since you recently switched to Mac as your platform for development, have you used BootCamp or VMWare Fusion to run Window-tied apps? What has been your experience if you have? The problem I&#8217;m dealing with right now is the very latest iMac is making a very good case for itself as my next purchase&#8230;but seeing as how I got CS4 MC last year, it would be a bit of a shame to have a great machine that I can only run my big apps through virtualization on. Is the experience fairly seemless? It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve used VMWare, so I assume it&#8217;s quite a bit smoother and better than it was then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
